Day ShiftResources
Site navigation

Answer page

What evidence should an AI coding agent leave after a change?

Require a written implementation summary with changed paths, validation results, unresolved risks, and an acceptance or follow-up decision.

Direct answer

After a change, an AI coding agent should leave the task it worked from, an implementation summary naming completed work and changed paths, the exact validation it ran and observed results, unresolved issues, and reconciliation against the acceptance criteria.

Day Shift validation smoke terminal output.

Practical guidance

Make the next review decision easier.

Evidence should be inspectable

A reviewer needs names of files, commands, and results, not a broad statement that the implementation is complete.

Evidence should match the task

Validation only supports acceptance when it covers the behavior and scope the task declared. A passing unrelated command is not sufficient.

Evidence should include gaps

Unresolved risks and skipped checks belong in the summary so a human can decide whether to accept, remediate, or split follow-up work.

Verified demo evidence

A public CLI result, not a completion claim.

This command and result are from the website’s checked-in synthetic repository demo. Substitute your own repository paths and validation command when you apply the workflow.
$ npm test
1 test passed; 0 failed

Authorship and sources

Trace this guidance to maintained product evidence.

Maintainer
Tianna McCoy ↗Day Shift maintainer; responsible for the repository-native workflow and release evidence referenced here.
Last updated
Tested Day Shift
v0.1.24

Keep exploring

Follow the next question, not a generic funnel.

How to Review AI-Generated Code Without Reading Every Line

Focus code review on the declared boundary, evidence, and high-risk decisions.

Read next

How to Prevent Coding Agents from Skipping Validation

Require executable validation up front and recorded results before coding-agent work can be accepted.

Read next

How to Make AI Coding-Agent Work Reviewable

Make coding-agent work reviewable with bounded repository artifacts, named validation, and written implementation evidence.

Read next

Find your answer

Have we answered your question?

Search the answer pages, concept, comparisons, demo, and FAQ without leaving the site.

Search by a problem, workflow step, or tool boundary.