Count outcomes, not output volume
Generated code, tokens, and agent sessions are activity signals. They do not show whether the work was accepted, maintainable, or valuable.
Answer page
Measure completed, accepted outcomes and their review and rework cost, not prompts sent or lines generated.
Direct answer
Measure coding-agent impact through accepted work: cycle time from scoped task to reconciled outcome, review effort, validation reliability, rework and rollback rate, and whether teams can complete more useful changes without increasing defects or coordination cost.
Practical guidance
Generated code, tokens, and agent sessions are activity signals. They do not show whether the work was accepted, maintainable, or valuable.
If agents reduce implementation time but create more review, defect, or rollback work, the apparent gain may not be real.
Repository tasks and reconciled milestones give teams a consistent unit for comparing cycle time and evidence quality across agent-assisted work.
Verified demo evidence
$ day-shift reconciliation build --milestone-overview <milestone-overview>
reconciliation_status: completedAuthorship and sources
Keep exploring
Make coding-agent work reviewable with bounded repository artifacts, named validation, and written implementation evidence.
Read nextThe repository evidence a reviewer needs after agent-assisted implementation.
Read nextHow repository workflow artifacts complement existing pull-request, review, and CI controls.
Read nextFind your answer
Search the answer pages, concept, comparisons, demo, and FAQ without leaving the site.
Search by a problem, workflow step, or tool boundary.